|
The
acting was about as good as American film gets. And it is also a
film with scant character development: We are given nothing more
than circumstantial evidence to explain how and why main characters
Tracy and Evie got to be the way they are, and few clues to make
sense of Tracy's rapid descent from normal pre-pubescence to drug-addled
floozy under Evie's influence. We are supposed to take Evie's coolness
and desirability, and her incredible self-centeredness that leads
her to betray Tracy, for granted.
A reviewer
in a Washington, DC magazine nicely summed up most of the criticism:
"you can't complain too much about a movie that tries to rise
above the norm, that strives to tell a story we've heard and seen
countless times before, but this time with frankness and honesty."
Well, I want to complain about this film, precisely because everyone
seems to be letting it off the hook and ignoring the racial undertones
to the story it tells. Thirteen is, perhaps inadvertently,
rife with racist stereotypes.
Here's
the story as I saw it: Tracy, a seemingly well-adjusted, white girl
with a hard-working if flaky, financially struggling, ex-drinker
single mom and decent enough guy for a brother suddenly ditches
her studious model immigrant (South and East Asian) friends to pursue
a life of sex and drugs under the influence of Evie, a manipulative
and self-absorbed Latina. Evie draws Tracy into her world of cool
older boys, nearly all of whom are African American. Amazingly,
not one of these older males of color is possessed of any sort of
moral compass. They are represented as utterly amoral, freely trafficking
in drugs and sex with middle-school aged girls. I suppose this gives
the audience the doubly transgressive thrill of watching 13 year
old girls having interracial sex. Yet I was disturbed by the fact
that none of the film's black males ever questions whether it's
OK to commit statutory rape with 13 year old girls, to provide them
with illicit drugs and alcohol, or to swap them like baseball cards.
Contrast
this with the girls' single encounter with an older white guy. Luke,
the lifeguard, rebuffs Evie's and Tracy's heavy handed attempt to
seduce him, throwing the girls out of his house and calling them
"jailbait." Somehow only this white male character has
the moral fortitude to resist the wiles of these 13 year old nymphomaniacs.
Granted,
the film's script was penned by a 15 year old girl and as such ought
to be cut some slack. Other reviewers have noted that in the end,
it's a bit of a reactionary film because it never seems to allow
that it can be healthy (if not inevitable in modern consumer society)
for teens to rebel against their parents' values before they've
fully formulated their own - interesting, since the film was written
by a teenager who hasn't yet had the time to recast her youthful
indiscretions as mistakes. Yet adult directors make choices about
how to represent the stories they bring to the screen, and thus
one has to ask director Catherine Hardwicke why she did not cast
at least one or two white guys in the 'bad guy' roles, or vice versa?
|
|
Few
adults who grew up in American society can claim to have made it
through adolescence unscathed. As teenagers become adults, they
have the task of adapting to a changing body, added responsibilities
and pressures in school, parents and the mysteries of sexuality.
The landmark age of thirteen takes kids from the depths of childhood
into puberty without warning. Young adults in their teens have difficult
times through this maturation process, and the subject of Catherine
Hardwicke's excellent film Thirteen (2003) is Tracy, a girl
about to turn into a very different woman.
Melanie
(Holly Hunter) and her two children Tracy (Evan Rachel Wood) and
Mason (Brady Corbet) are a family living in Los Angeles while struggling
to survive on the income of a single mother. Tracy comes to the
forefront as a complex young woman of thirteen, enduring the pain
she feels about her parents' divorce, the absence of a father figure,
her mother's recovery from substance abuse and her inability to
impress the in-crowd. At the beginning of the film, Tracy is more
than a cookie-cutter teenager. While adhering to adult expectations
she does her homework and plays with childhood friends, but her
inner turmoil is evident as she diverges from these standards by
turning to self-injury as a coping mechanism.
Soon
Tracy befriends Evie (Nikki Reed), a free-spirit of sorts already
involved in a life of petty crime, drinking, drugs and sex. Although
Evie acts as the catalyst for Tracy's involvement in such activities,
the film does not fall into the trap of painting Tracy as a "good-girl-gone-bad"
with Evie serving as the evil temptress. Tracy had her own demons
before meeting Evie. Yet her relationship with Evie provides her
with new ways to express them.
Just
how easy would it be for a thirteen-year-old to get caught up in
a life filled with drugs, sex and thrills? It is not entirely due
to peer pressure per se. Tracy's new found life provides her with
something she was missing, something she was searching for. The
film realistically portrays the complicated mix between the release
and the rush she gets from these experiences and behaviors; a freedom
and a power that she had not felt before. Prior to her involvement
with Evie, Tracy dealt with her internal conflicts through her writing
and self-injury. Tracy is clearly not alone in her use of self-mutilation
as a coping mechanism; numerous adolescent girls cut themselves
to deal with overwhelming feelings (Miller, 1994; Levenkron, 1998).
It would be easy to explain her behavior as a "call for help"
but the film prohibits the viewer from falling into that clichéd
interpretation. Tracy takes great pains to hide her cutting, while
at the same time trying to share her poetry with her mother. Mel
is moved by the poem, but also too harried to devote the attention
her daughters' needs expressed in the poem itself. Tracy attempts
to hide her stealing, drug use, and piercing from her mother. These
behaviors are not a mere cry for help. Instead they demonstrate
an attempt to express her pain by acting out instead of through
internalization. One could even argue that Tracy's antics are preferable
to her silent suffering, alleviated only through her episodes of
cutting.
Working
as a hairdresser to support her two children, Tracy's mother Melanie
is there for her daughter, but only to a limited degree. Again,
the film doesn't fall into stereotypes regarding their relationship.
Mel treats her daughter as more of a friend than a child in the
beginning of the film. In actuality Tracy acts more like a caretaker
than her mother, chastising Mel for giving complimentary haircuts
and allowing friends to stay in their home free from any obligations.
Once Tracy begins spending more time with Evie, Melanie continues
her role as a friend to both the girls. Although it quickly becomes
clear that she is not completely comfortable in this position, Mel
still grants Tracy more freedom than she's comfortable giving (i.e.,
buying new clothes, allowing Evie to stay over often). Once Tracy's
troubles continue to mount, Mel tries without success to exert the
authority she never employed in the past. Mel is far from a perfect
mother. She's no June Cleaver but she's not Joan Crawford either.
She works hard to raise her family. She's successful in some areas
of parenting just as she fails in others.
The
significance in Thirteen is that it provides a glimpse into
the world of a seemingly "normal" girl struggling with
a need for belonging and an outlet for her pain. The film provides
adults with the opportunity to understand the motivation behind
adolescent "experimentation."
The
value of this film is in the way it makes Tracy's journey and behaviors
understandable. Educators, parents, and all those interested the
welfare of youth can often be found shaking their heads, saying
"I don't understand, why do kids do that . . ." This film
makes Tracy's experience palpable, believable, and understandable
to such well meaning adults. Thirteen clearly struck a chord
in these viewers as evidenced by the numerous comments and questions
it provoked in mothers (detailed in the message board section of
the film's official website, http://forum.foxsearchlight.com,
2003).
By
illustrating the very real benefits Tracy's choices provide her
at first, the film Thirteen will help adults avoid the "just
say no" platitudes and provide insight into the complicated
experiences of being an adolescent girl in today's society.
References
Hardwicke,
C. (director) (2003). Thirteen. Fox Searchlight.
Levenkron,
S. (1998). Cutting: Understanding and overcoming self-mutilation.
New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Miller,
D. (1994). Women who hurt themselves: A book of hope and understanding.
New York: BasicBooks.
Thirteen
official website. (2003). http://forum.foxsearchlight.com.
Trey
Teufel, a member of the Screen Actors' Guild, graduated from the
Department of Theatre and Drama at Indiana University. Currently
he works as an actor and freelance writer in New York City.
Emily
Greytak, M.S.Ed., has worked with adolescents from a variety of
backgrounds as a rape crisis worker and youth advocate. A doctoral
student at the University of Pennsylvania, her research focuses
on the effectiveness of violence prevention interventions.
|